|
Post by Rob Vigeant Jr. on Aug 8, 2013 17:07:49 GMT -5
I would however like to know who voted 4-1... I can promise that will NEVER... Ever never.... Neva Neva happen...just a hunch... Riddle me that you brainiacs
|
|
|
Post by Duke Sarkisian on Aug 8, 2013 17:38:26 GMT -5
^^^^lol....robs rite...neva...neva.
|
|
|
Post by Josh Handeland on Aug 8, 2013 18:14:50 GMT -5
Rob, what about the guys thy voted 3-2 for Ken? U think that's more likely to happen than u winning 4-1?
|
|
|
Post by Rob Vigeant Jr. on Aug 8, 2013 18:20:01 GMT -5
Lol... Yes... Yes I do
|
|
user123
Silver Member
VA
Posts: 381
|
Post by user123 on Aug 8, 2013 20:35:46 GMT -5
Rob, what about the guys thy voted 3-2 for Ken? U think that's more likely to happen than u winning 4-1? Josh, it could never get to a final score of 4-1 if they are doing best of 5. That is why Rob is laughing at it.
|
|
|
Post by CHRISTIAN BINNIE on Aug 9, 2013 4:48:19 GMT -5
Don't doubt Robs left......
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Garcia on Aug 9, 2013 9:21:25 GMT -5
Well it's obvious the "4-1" should have been "3-1", as that option is missing, yet there are these two options: undefeated (3-0) and 3-2. So maybe the guys voting 4-1 just couldn't find "3-1" as an option, realized the silly mistake, and voted 3-1 instead. There, I riddled it for ya Rob.
|
|
|
Post by Rob Vigeant Jr. on Aug 9, 2013 9:55:04 GMT -5
^^^... Thank you captain obvious I kinda figured that... It was just fun to pick on
... Thank you Christian... My left is off the radar ... But primed to upset
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Garcia on Aug 9, 2013 10:38:37 GMT -5
I am in a great mood today so I might as well tell you my second thought on why the 4-1 appeared: Marcio recently had practise with Mr. Smith and Mr. Marrocco... perhaps word got out that Marcio was much stronger than them (??). This is just a guess, of course, I have no way of knowing what happened in that practise... someone asked, but Dave replied "Ask Marcio", so it's still a mystery for us fanboys not living near the pullers. So maybe, just maybe, after realizing that you (Rob) beat Marcio 3 times (although losing 4-3 in the supermatch result) a few months ago, then maybe the fellows voting for "4-1" thought you would be so dominating over Ken Smith that they just threw an extra win in there!! I know, that makes absolutely no sense, it's intended to be humorous. In fact, I'm not done yet: "Why the loss then? Why 4-1 and not 4-0 if he will be so dominant?", you may ask. Well here is my best guess: Rob was so convincing in his wins, and in one of the matches he thought he had won before the match even started, and started doing his trademark double bicep post and table smacking, all while still being strapped to his opponent... so the refs had to call a foul, hence the loss, and the 4-1 result. Dang... no matter how hard I try I can't be funny. Please enlighten us with one of those encyclopedia-chapter-length posts of yours dude, they are top notch
|
|
|
Post by Rick Laton on Aug 9, 2013 12:45:16 GMT -5
I am in a great mood today so I might as well tell you my second thought on why the 4-1 appeared: Marcio recently had practise with Mr. Smith and Mr. Marrocco... perhaps word got out that Marcio was much stronger than them (??). This is just a guess, of course, I have no way of knowing what happened in that practise... someone asked, but Dave replied "Ask Marcio", so it's still a mystery for us fanboys not living near the pullers. So maybe, just maybe, after realizing that you (Rob) beat Marcio 3 times (although losing 4-3 in the supermatch result) a few months ago, then maybe the fellows voting for "4-1" thought you would be so dominating over Ken Smith that they just threw an extra win in there!! I know, that makes absolutely no sense, it's intended to be humorous. In fact, I'm not done yet: "Why the loss then? Why 4-1 and not 4-0 if he will be so dominant?", you may ask. Well here is my best guess: Rob was so convincing in his wins, and in one of the matches he thought he had won before the match even started, and started doing his trademark double bicep post and table smacking, all while still being strapped to his opponent... so the refs had to call a foul, hence the loss, and the 4-1 result. Dang... no matter how hard I try I can't be funny. Please enlighten us with one of those encyclopedia-chapter-length posts of yours dude, they are top notch Thinking outside the box. I like it !
|
|
|
Post by Nate Gagnon on Aug 18, 2013 12:27:36 GMT -5
Because of new commitments to the UAL, Rob will not be able to do this supermatch at this time. Its completely understandable and a great move as an athlete and competitor for Rob to go do the UAL thing--wish you all the best buddy!!!
|
|