|
Post by Ryan Thames on Oct 9, 2006 19:27:09 GMT -5
My moms Exboyfriend was arrested for dwi 5 times. Spent 6 months in prison. then Continued to drive drunk. Even after AA
Last week he died.
His liver gave out on him.
I think president bush is doing ok with that sentence.
I think China, South Korea and Japan need to form a coalition with the utmost support of the United States. And tear NK up. Hang the idiot.....or better yet. we can get our american tree hugger democrats to go over there and the damage he did to the enviroment......forget the loss of life...LETS DO IT FOR THE TREES!!
If those countrie dont take him out soon.....I feel we have a responsibility to obliterate North Korea.
(USMC ,When it absolutly has to be destroyed overnight)
|
|
Harry Kern
Silver Member
Sneads, Florida
Posts: 340
|
Post by Harry Kern on Oct 9, 2006 19:36:09 GMT -5
Would you had rather have Kerry in office so we would then be attacked? You have to admit we are better off with Bush in office than Gore or Kerry. Bush holds true to his ideals of protecting this country even if it infringes on some people's privacy.
People already blame Bush for all of this world's chaos. Not true. He is the person who stands up to and for what needs to be said and done. Bottom line.
Said the GOP supporter. ;D Look I am a democrat who does not support war. I like fist fights on TV and thats about as far as I go with war. Not to say I don't think its a great thing to go represent your country during war time, but I wouldn't send my american brethran in without a direct attack. If I did make the mistake of doing so I wouldn't leave them there for years, all the while blowing billions a month to save face. I sure as hell wouldn't allocate 20 million tax payer dollars for a celebration party after we achieved "victory." But that is just me... Maybe I was brain washed as a member of the young democrats? Maybe I was wrong in thinking about the american worker over the american profit? Maybe... Just maybe I was wrong in thinking that a candidate who was only elected through scandal, without the popular vote by the highest margin in history, but rather through the electoral college could be unfit to run a sports franchise, let alone a country. Maybe my candidate's weren't responsible for the internet, and may have been known more for ketchup than politics, but at least they could spell, speak and don't have a cocain hole in thier noses. Maybe I just shouldn't be in this conversation... As I will just piss people off. Oh and by the way I am patriotic in case any of you think otherwise. I think serving my country for 4 years as a marine proves that. So you wouldn't send any troops unless we were attacked first?? In other words you would allow american civilians to die before you did anything even if you knew there was a threat. What if the attack was nuclear??? Would that be enough to warrant sending troops?? Don't get me wrong, I don't like the fact we went to war but I think it was necessary. I look at the stiuation like Hussien was a criminal on probation, if someone breaks thier probation we don't just let them go and give them chance after chance do we?? We played the weapons inspection game for nearly 10 years and time after time Hussien would simply stop letting the inspectors do thier jobs......so how long should we have played that little game? 15 years.....20? Maybe he had a WMD, maybe he was close to having one nobody knows that for sure.......and just because we didn't find anything doesn't mean they weren't there, they could have been moved out of the country (we can't even keep track of our own borders and you think we can control thiers?) No Bush isn't the smartest guy on the planet, but he's no worse than most politicians Democratic or Republican. Nobody in Washington is innocent. But he is in a much better position to make that call than any of us. So for everyone who thinks we're only over there so W can get revenge for daddy or it was just for oil I think you guys should get together with the JFK assasination conspiracy theorists and go bowling. Now as for the whole North Korea Nuke ordeal, I'm inclined to agree with Mr Battles on that one. Now if thier long range missle test had succeeded I'd have a totally different opinion End Rant.
|
|
|
Post by Matl'e McDaniel on Oct 9, 2006 19:38:47 GMT -5
I'm sorry to hear about your mothers Ex... I hope that he found some type of peace before he passed on. I wish people would take thier health seriously... If not for them then for the ones who love them.
I can take that you think we all hug tree's... Especially that reublicans hug little boys. Ouch! And to think your party elected Foley.
|
|
|
Post by Matl'e McDaniel on Oct 9, 2006 19:48:21 GMT -5
"The sins of the father atoned by the son" A quote about Bush
Two marines gave these answers when they were asked about the innocent civilians of Baghdad that have been caught up in the war. Amazingly enough the audio clips were used in a album by Lamb of God. It made it 3 days before Wal-Mart took it off its shelves along with every Bush backing company.
We killed a lot of innocent civilians. To us every civilian in Baghdad was a terrorist. They said 'they are now in civilian clothes' that makes everybody free game, But if they came in our perimeter, we lit 'em up. And when we would pull the body out, and when we would search the car, we would find nothing. This took place time and time again. No harm, no foul, that's OK, don't worry about it, Because this is a new kind of war, this is an eradication."
"I honestly feel we're committing genocide over here, I don't believe in killing civilians, and I'm not going to kill civilians for the United States Marine Corp."
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Oct 9, 2006 21:45:12 GMT -5
If two out of ten civilians are terrorists. And the civilians are aware of this........why are the civilians approaching the marines?
Its not genocide. Its war.
Sounds like you qouted a dumb marine.
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Oct 9, 2006 21:47:36 GMT -5
I can take that you think we all hug tree's... Especially that reublicans hug little boys. Ouch! And to think your party elected Foley. That was a good one ill give you that. The trash has been taken out. How come When a republican does wrong. both parties condemn him.......yet Democrat condemn all republicans. But when a democrat is sexually immoral....its noone elses business.
|
|
|
Post by Matl'e McDaniel on Oct 9, 2006 23:53:05 GMT -5
Good question... I wish that I could answer it, but I think we all can agree that more politicians than not our dirty and should probably not be elected. The problem with the fundamentals of it all is; If a person was not dirty or good at pulling the wool of our eyes they would never be elected in the first place. I have known many a good ones, but that was on a lower level and thier truthfull nature and uncrooked ways are more of a downfall and whats keeping them down. Sad but true.
|
|
|
Post by gambit on Oct 10, 2006 0:22:07 GMT -5
Tell that to all the bums on Welfare who has also ruined this one time noble gesture to help the needy. I guess your Democratic party can stand for those who WON'T stand for themselves? OK, what happened on Bush's second term? What happened then? Was it another scandal as well which got him back in office, or does Halliburton have that much power? Why didn't Gore run again for office in 2004? Gore only advocated his candidacy based on inventing the internet and a "glorious lock-box". Kerry was riding...I'm sorry...still riding on the back of his wealthy wife and under the influence of Ted Kennedy (what a winner). However Bush won, he won none-the-less. He has not disgraced the White House by spewing his DNA everywhere in the Oval Office. Then lying about it to the publics face. What integrity. Nor is he hiding under a table in waiting on us to be attacked AGAIN. He is taking care of what has been needed to be faced for decades. Reagan made an example of Momar Qaddafi in the 80's and Bush is trying to do the same in this war. Only it is a barbaric war that has no rules. Bush's main problems are his own citizens banding against him with every move he makes. How can anyone expect him to do what is NEEDED to be done with his hands tied behind his back? If you are one of the ones saying, 'We should wait for us to be attacked before we do anything', then you are helping in binding his arms. Weren't we attacked first? Didn't he react?(IMO, he didn't get to respond as soon as he needed to due to red tape) I do not agree with everything President Bush says or decides, but support him I will. I must support him. Not like a sheep being led to the wolf's den, but as an American who is to support their commander in chief no matter the personal ideals. I do not feel one has more patriotism by serving his country in the military than not one who serves as such as a citizen. I would love to enlist and stand shoulder to shoulder with my brethren. I applaud you for your service to and for this country, Matl'e. Do we need to take care of Kimm Jong Il? Indeed. I have said it before. We need to send in the right group to handle the business properly. BTW, I have only noticed FOX being the only Republican supportive (if you will) cable station. CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, etc., etc. has always been the Democratic supporter. We can't have at least one? I'll tell you what, elect Bill O'Reilly for President and get out of his way. Then again we could have someone like Michael Moore in that place. Before I go I want to ask this simple question that has been answered with a lot of, "I don't know"(s) If Bush was that bad the first time, why did this country put him back in the White House?
|
|
|
Post by gambit on Oct 10, 2006 0:25:48 GMT -5
Good question... I wish that I could answer it, but I think we all can agree that more politicians than not our dirty and should probably not be elected. A politician is a politician is a politician. I agree with you on this wholeheartedly.
|
|
|
Post by Matl'e McDaniel on Oct 10, 2006 3:03:38 GMT -5
Okay I will give you that I want Kim taken out as quickly as possible and there have been spec ops out there trying to figure out a better than half ass job for a while. The fact thhat we know he has mass grave sites and that we know he is clinicaly insane makes us all a little nervous, but the fact alone that he is crazy is what keeps us at bay. Bush won the second term, because no president in history has lost an election during war. When you are at war your approval rating goes through the roof, because of patriotism and peer advocatsy. Thus it would be impossible to not be elected for a second term while at war. DIdn't see them showing how he won by the smallest of leads though? Imagine if there was no war and all we saw were clips of Bush acting all nimbly bimbly like a little kitten. He does love yarn! And the fact that our vice president can shoot a man in the face while drunk and have a ticker that cosists of two racoon hearts held together by legos is amazing. If we elected Bill Oreilly we would be getting lots of heavy breathing while they were doing the phone banking. Well at least we know that phone sex would become a little less taboo. John "1-900" Stanton would love that.
|
|
|
Post by gambit on Oct 10, 2006 6:53:00 GMT -5
I can surely see Stanton in a "1-900" capacity - scary! 1-900-THE-BUMM As far as Bush being re-elected due to no President in history ever being outted during wartime is the same, I would guess, as saying since he is the worst president in the history of our country, then he needed to be made an example of and be replaced. Correct? Under that assumption wouldn't, "There's a first time for everything" addage be inserted here? John Stanton not for President!
|
|
|
Post by gambit on Oct 10, 2006 7:02:03 GMT -5
Hi John!!
|
|
|
Post by jamesretarides on Oct 10, 2006 9:29:39 GMT -5
That is the funniest thing I have ever read. People that support politicians are being idiotic. People that support leaders are not. When is the last time this country had a leader? And don't give me any B.S. from either side of the political spectrum. We have become such a litigious society, to a point that I am concerned when the neighborhood kids play football in my side yard. Republicans, Democrats and people like myself universally hate lawyers (the pool of idiots that we largely elect our leaders from) and career politicians but we are ready to defend them at the drop of a hat. Silly, don't you think? One idiot, classist, perverted, drunk, economic freak-show mess-of-a-human phony puppet after another. The term monotony doesn't even scratch the surface.
|
|
|
Post by CHRISTIAN BINNIE on Oct 10, 2006 10:14:53 GMT -5
A FRIGGIN MEN JAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by gambit on Oct 10, 2006 11:33:12 GMT -5
So....what do you really mean, James? The way I see it, is we have a selection of only who runs for office. We are limited to the best crook of the two. Therefore, I say whomever can do better - run for office themselves. KWIM?
|
|