|
Post by Devon Larratt on Mar 8, 2010 20:21:27 GMT -5
Mike gould classic 1 on 1 Larratt vs Underwood format - proposed 5rounds, but flexible time between rds - proposed 2 min, but flexible cash - proposed 1000$ + or -
Don you feel great, lets put this one in the books, i think it could be a great match, see you all in a few weeks!
|
|
|
Post by Shawn Lattimer on Mar 8, 2010 20:53:14 GMT -5
Wow
|
|
|
Post by Scott Wright on Mar 8, 2010 21:28:17 GMT -5
Sounds like a good solution to me.
|
|
|
Post by CHRISTIAN BINNIE on Mar 8, 2010 21:33:05 GMT -5
Always with the challenge matches.......Y?...Can't win a meet?......LMAO
|
|
|
Post by Michael Phaup on Mar 8, 2010 21:49:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hungry Hippo on Mar 8, 2010 22:15:00 GMT -5
A challenge match tests the validity between two opponents. A tournament has too many variables.
|
|
|
Post by Ed "Bam" Moehle on Mar 8, 2010 23:12:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by "VENGEANCE" -David Rivera- on Mar 9, 2010 0:03:17 GMT -5
Nice!
|
|
|
Post by Kenny Flynn on Mar 9, 2010 0:04:18 GMT -5
Quinn you are wise beyond your years.
|
|
|
Post by Tim Lewis on Mar 9, 2010 1:31:42 GMT -5
We have already seen that this matchup is interesting.
It will be interesting to see though what happens in a challenge match format of five or six rounds. I think Devon is more of favorite in a match with a large number of rounds. If this does happen, a lot more will be exposed that already has been.
|
|
|
Post by Brendan Downes on Mar 9, 2010 2:02:23 GMT -5
People want to see this!
|
|
|
Post by dixonglory on Mar 9, 2010 2:09:42 GMT -5
GOOD LUCK DEVON We like to see u as the king of the table
|
|
|
Post by Kenny Flynn on Mar 9, 2010 2:23:00 GMT -5
it appeared to me that the pin pads were the same elevation as the elbow pads. some tables have the pin pads about 1" above the elbow pads. table configuration could determine outcome.
|
|
|
Post by Stefan Gordean on Mar 9, 2010 2:38:55 GMT -5
Bo3 would be hell more suited for what's wanted to be proven. People wanna see a re-match or something as close as it can be and not a diferent kind of animal (i.e. 5 rds) in which we all know where the leverage is going to shift...
|
|
|
Post by John Wilson on Mar 9, 2010 2:46:09 GMT -5
Bo3 would be hell more suited for what's wanted to be proven. People wanna see a re-match or something as close as it can be and not a diferent kind of animal (i.e. 5 rds) in which we all know where the leverage is going to shift... Excellent point
|
|