|
|
Post by TK on Nov 3, 2012 10:52:34 GMT -5
DURRANT, OK COME GET TWISTED!!  |
|
|
|
Post by TK on Nov 4, 2012 7:32:25 GMT -5
Would love to see a rematch if Robby Burnett & Chris Chandler!!!
Not enough can be said about mr Wildcard Robby!
Good win on Chandler Bro!
Did In The Hook take notice of this?
TK
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Nov 5, 2012 12:08:16 GMT -5
APRIL 13TH FOLKS!
|
|
|
|
Post by michaelmeador on Nov 14, 2012 21:06:44 GMT -5
Would love to see a rematch if Robby Burnett & Chris Chandler!!! Not enough can be said about mr Wildcard Robby! Good win on Chandler Bro! Did In The Hook take notice of this?[/u] TK[/quote] NO! |
|
|
|
Post by TK on Nov 14, 2012 21:08:27 GMT -5
Would love to see a rematch if Robby Burnett & Chris Chandler!!! Not enough can be said about mr Wildcard Robby! Good win on Chandler Bro! Did In The Hook take notice of this?[/u] TK[/quote] NO![/quote] Well maybe a rematch? |
|
|
|
Post by michaelmeador on Nov 14, 2012 21:13:36 GMT -5
I am sure Robert wouldn't oppose... |
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Nov 14, 2012 21:43:43 GMT -5
Would love to see a rematch if Robby Burnett & Chris Chandler!!! Not enough can be said about mr Wildcard Robby! Good win on Chandler Bro! Did In The Hook take notice of this?[/u] TK[/quote] NO![/quote] What weight was Robby at when they pulled? |
|
|
|
Post by michaelmeador on Nov 14, 2012 22:12:22 GMT -5
What weight was Robby at when they pulled? Chris-238 Robby-255 |
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Nov 14, 2012 22:58:43 GMT -5
What weight was Robby at when they pulled? Chris-238 Robby-255 Then that's why it didn't effect ITH rankings, Chris is ranked in 220 |
|
|
|
Post by michaelmeador on Nov 14, 2012 23:04:51 GMT -5
It's 242..
Lattimer moved up in the heavies by beating Chris when he actually weighed 220.. No disrespect to Lattimer He's a bad dude, It's more of a knock on how the rankings are configured..
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Nov 14, 2012 23:28:46 GMT -5
It's 242.. Lattimer moved up in the heavies by beating Chris when he actually weighed 220.. No disrespect to Lattimer He's a bad dude, It's more of a knock on how the rankings are configured.. My bad how did I forget there was no 220 lol I could see a scenario where say Chris Beats Don Underwood (example) and Robby beats Chris and Robby gets a nod over Don, the way styles play out even that is pretty subjective, but when ranking you use the facts you have, hard to make everyone happy but overall the ITH rankings people do a great job with what they have |
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Nov 14, 2012 23:36:16 GMT -5
An idea that could be very interesting to we played out is a rotating cycle, where when the rankings update is done it accounts for all the data in that period, since 12months is the cutoff (in most cases) for inactivity a 12 month cycle would be current, seems like a program to keep track of this data wouldn't be hard to come up with, just a thought
|
|
|
|
Post by michaelmeador on Nov 14, 2012 23:53:19 GMT -5
It's 242.. Lattimer moved up in the heavies by beating Chris when he actually weighed 220.. No disrespect to Lattimer He's a bad dude, It's more of a knock on how the rankings are configured.. My bad how did I forget there was no 220 lol I could see a scenario where say Chris Beats Don Underwood (example) and Robby beats Chris and Robby gets a nod over Don, the way styles play out even that is pretty subjective, but when ranking you use the facts you have, hard to make everyone happy but overall the ITH rankings people do a great job with what they have What they have is the fact that Robby beat a 238lb Chris (more than once but calls were made and matches end up differently) (Chris" stamina in second to none) and Robby wasn't able to win the tournament. People have been able to sneak in a win on Chris in the past year but he always comes back in the same event and smokes them, wasn't the case with Robby. I would comfortably sit Robby at #8 in the 242's seeing how he pulls mostly at 242 and I believe Rob Vigeant and Marcio are under-ranked.. |
|
|
|
Post by TK on Nov 15, 2012 11:58:15 GMT -5
with Chris beating Ron Bath straight up.....would Robby be reconized somehow? for beating a heavier Chandler?
at that moment Robby was ahead of Chris......Chris got it back.....then Robby should be right behind Chris.
IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by michaelmeador on Nov 16, 2012 20:22:15 GMT -5
with Chris beating Ron Bath straight up..... would Robby be reconized somehow?[/u] for beating a heavier Chandler? at that moment Robby was ahead of Chris......Chris got it back.....then Robby should be right behind Chris. IMO[/quote] Maybe one day... |
|
