|
|
Post by Todd Opitz on Jul 14, 2013 0:43:01 GMT -5
The Top 20 in any order true superheavyweights, not a 240lb blown up on d-bol or test or androl, Right Handed, yes I know what you'll say Micheal Todd, Dave Chaffee, some other, but those guys are 242 and below, This Poll is for the Real big men of the sport.
1. Tim Bresan
2. Jerry Cardotte
3. Robert Bishop
4. Luke Eldridge
5. Dave Marracco
6. Don Underwood
7. Richard Lupkes
8. Shawn Turner
9. Dave Randell
10. Blaine M.
11. Glenn Brooks
12. Mike Ayello
13. Eric Woelfel
14. Paul Fischer
15. Harold Owens
16. Travis Bagent
17. Eric Guevin
18. Devin Mackin
19. Lindely Keating
20. Robby Burnette
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew Bieganski on Jul 14, 2013 1:11:00 GMT -5
Forgot nick zinna he's a shoe in. Brandon boudin (spelling). Shawn lattimer. There's also lots of sleepers that could very well b in top 20
I dont think Randall has competed since 09. And I think it's been a while for Eldridge also
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob Vigeant Jr. on Jul 14, 2013 9:01:13 GMT -5
Ummm... Not sure of the criteria here, so you have to be a natural heavyweight... Not a drug enhanced one... And even if there are a boat load of guys who can lay it on you at 242.. 220... 200... This list is just for the heavies even though any lower class can compete there ?... Fair enough... Your poll
However... I see one major flaw, you want to eliminate d-Bol blown up guys... Or natural 242 and below as they aren't "true heavies"... Ok... But I see quite a few on your list that used to pull 220 or less as adults... And these are big men today... Go research and you'll see
Now... It's easy to throw around " natural heavy"... The " big men"... Let's ponder the fact if everyone walked around at 10% body fat... Now, how many TRUE heavyweights are on that list ?... Be honest now
There is a difference between being a true big man... And being heavy...
In my world an in shape 200 is big... That's me... In AW I guess being 5'10" and being 300 means you are huge... Just because the scale reads that way....
Anyhow... Interesting enough... But If you are gonna look at the steroid angle... Which does carry weight... Look at the unnecessary weight factor that makes the majority heavies.... And also heavies that not long ago were sub 242 by a margin
|
|
|
|
Post by Nate Gagnon on Jul 14, 2013 23:13:38 GMT -5
Todd are you saying the guys on this list are all clean? Im sure some are--but if you believe all those guys are clean then then I have some ocean front property in Montana I would like to sell you.
|
|
Don Smith
New Member
Ottawa High Hookers
Posts: 19
|
Post by Don Smith on Jul 16, 2013 17:50:17 GMT -5
I agree with RVJ, I don't understand this list. There are a couple guys who walk around under 242 and bulk up to compete. How are they on the list?
|
|
|
|
Post by Larry Alexie on Jul 16, 2013 20:20:06 GMT -5
THAT LIST IS VERY QUESTIONABLE I WASHED UP TWO OF THEM BADDLY
|
|
