|
|
Post by Brent Norris on Apr 16, 2007 14:10:28 GMT -5
I got the point and agree Chris, Just talk'n smack.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeramie Towle on Apr 16, 2007 18:58:00 GMT -5
I don't think seeding would be a very good idea. I agree with the idea of just pull and see where the chips fall. If you seed people on how well they have pulled in the past like you have 12 pullers and you set it up with 1 pulls 12 2 pulls 11 and so on, then the there will always be the same people in the final 4 within in reason because they are always pulling the not as good pullers who are ranked at the bottom. now thats not to say that they can't beat the higher ranked person, but it would create an unfair advantage. just my op.
|
|
|
|
Post by larryrehfeld on Apr 16, 2007 19:04:39 GMT -5
I think that I have to go with random seeding. There are to many variables to wiegh when deciding who goes where. I have been at a tournament where the promoters tend to do that and it didnt seem very fair to me. If you seed completely randomly, it takes away any bias .
|
|
|
|
Post by chrislydman on Apr 16, 2007 19:08:43 GMT -5
Thanks Brent! Jeremy and Larry,  |
|
|
|
Post by chrislydman on Apr 16, 2007 19:09:40 GMT -5
And Brent, your smack is the smack of your opponents hand hittin' the pad Bro!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brent Norris on Apr 16, 2007 20:54:16 GMT -5
 Thanks Chris, I needed that boost.
|
|
Thanks Chris, I needed that boost.