|
Post by Ryan Thames on Apr 26, 2007 13:15:38 GMT -5
Many of us believe in bible prophecy friend. Im sure Allen does as well as myself.
Whats your point?
Earthquakes and even bible prophecy have nothing to do with global warming.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Edwards on Apr 26, 2007 15:12:45 GMT -5
Are you saying that global warming is a bible Prophecy Robert?
|
|
|
Post by Justin Kaufman on Apr 26, 2007 19:11:42 GMT -5
I have been told I am crazy for not believing man has been to the moon too!!! I don't believe most of what is said in the media.
|
|
|
Post by gambit on Apr 26, 2007 20:33:40 GMT -5
There are several things you can count on being true. - Justin, JD, Bob, and Matl'e are weird
- John Stanton is weird...er
- ...and the new radar on weather.com
Hi ya'll !!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Apr 27, 2007 3:55:47 GMT -5
the bible does say that a third of the earth will be burned up
6. And the seven angels which had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound. 7. The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up. 8. And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood; 9. And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed. 10. And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; 11. And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter. 12. And the fourth angel sounded, and the third part of the sun was smitten, and the third part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; so as the third part of them was darkened, and the day shone not for a third part of it, and the night likewise. 13. And I beheld, and heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, Woe, woe, woe, to the inhabiters of the earth by reason of the other voices of the trumpet of the three angels, which are yet to sound!
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Apr 27, 2007 3:57:43 GMT -5
i wouldnt say that global warming would cause anything like this. sounds to me like nuclear war.....which is a much more logical assessment
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Apr 27, 2007 3:59:25 GMT -5
Verse 8 defenitly sounds like the asteroid tho
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Edwards on Apr 27, 2007 9:49:47 GMT -5
I would agree.
|
|
|
Post by Robert Bishop on Apr 27, 2007 16:41:51 GMT -5
Some doint think that America is in bible prophecy while others say Revelations 18 is about America[New York].I Have heard some say that Ezekiel 38and39 is a joint prophecy of Israel,America,and Britan. Joel 2and3 Zechariah 14 are against Israel and those who fight against them. Matthew 24 is also prophetic
|
|
|
Post by Mat Helmer on Apr 27, 2007 17:15:00 GMT -5
the bible does say that a third of the earth will be burned up 6. And the seven angels which had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound. 7. The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up. 8. And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood; 9. And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed. 10. And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; 11. And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter. 12. And the fourth angel sounded, and the third part of the sun was smitten, and the third part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; so as the third part of them was darkened, and the day shone not for a third part of it, and the night likewise. 13. And I beheld, and heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, Woe, woe, woe, to the inhabiters of the earth by reason of the other voices of the trumpet of the three angels, which are yet to sound! Why does it all say "thirds"?
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Apr 28, 2007 4:51:30 GMT -5
Why does it all say "thirds"?[/quote] i dont know, i assume its talking about a large region of the world because it always mentions "THE" third part.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2007 10:17:43 GMT -5
Whether or not anyone says or believes that "global warming" is true in its present form as a theory is largely irrelevant, in my opinion. The only thing scientists can do is to make accurate measurements in order to generate reliable data from which we try to draw conclusions. There is a large amount of data out there. Some debate how it was collected, and therefore raise questions about the conclusions drawn. Some debate whether there are statistically significant trends that can be linked to physical mechanisms that could cause such trends. Others debate what those mechanisms could be. If you really want to debate this, don't go looking at media-filtered/diluted accounts given by untrained reporters. Don't go looking at politically-infused sources either. As for blogs written by no-names? Gimme a break... Go to the primary sources of knowledge (not opinion) about this issue. In this country, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is as good as it gets. If you search ( www.noaa.gov/search.html) on global warming, you will find lots of useful information from which you can draw your own conclusions (some folks don't like to do this...). Yes, the average temperature of the earth's crust seems to be increasing. At this point, you have to look at what the ramifications are in terms of biology and other factors. One can debate ad nauseum whether there is divine prophecy or anything like that involved. Personally, I've got better things to do than that. Such as mow the lawn. Alternatively, you can just ask Allen why okra is categorized as mucilage, and whether a warmer crust might make for an easier-to-digest variety. The answer here is likely just as complicated, and likely just as interesting. The delivery of that message, though, will surely be entertaining! Hi Allen! Is it warm down there? edit: sorry, forgot to include url tags..
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Apr 28, 2007 13:17:13 GMT -5
if the curst is warming..........perhaps it was too cold to begin with.... The earth obviously goes through warming and cooling cycles, and you cannot conclude the we are headed towards and ice age or a fire. This is the defenition of paranoiya sp?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2007 14:38:20 GMT -5
There surely is a lotta cold out there!!! I think the real issue is not whether the average temperature has increased - it's clear that it has. This in the strictest sense means global warming is occurring (and there is also global cooling, as Ryan says, depending on where we are in the cycle). The question is how/whether this period of warming matters. To change the average by a small amount could have big consequences, but no one is really in a position to accurately say what those are. My opinion is that unless we are more certain: (i) of what the consequences are, and (ii) that we can proactively do something to curb it, it is best left as pleasant (!) conversation over beer and okra (or wine and peas)... Or, in Allen's case, over okra juice. You sure it's not warm down there Allen!?!?
|
|
Harry Kern
Silver Member
Sneads, Florida
Posts: 340
|
Post by Harry Kern on Apr 28, 2007 21:23:10 GMT -5
so how about this one:
There was a period before the ice age, what if the warming of the crust and melting ice caps are just the earth naturally returning to it's pre ice age conditions.........just a thought
|
|