|
|
Post by Tony Carpenter on Mar 8, 2005 18:42:40 GMT -5
HMMMM....Decisions, Decisions. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by STEVE PHIPPS on Mar 8, 2005 20:44:42 GMT -5
Too bad we can't get together!
But have to admit it doesn't surprise me too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steven Lareau on Mar 8, 2005 21:02:24 GMT -5
it gets so confusing
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeramie Towle on Mar 9, 2005 14:02:03 GMT -5
since the AAA is having a novice division does that mean they will be having a novice division at the worlds in nov?
|
|
|
|
Post by Olin Lucas on Mar 9, 2005 14:16:37 GMT -5
As far as I know worlds has never had a novice division, and more than likely won't. But who am I to make that decision???
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony Carpenter on Mar 9, 2005 14:48:11 GMT -5
It really would be weird to have a class that defines "The Worlds Best Novice." ;D Sounds kind of redundant to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steven Lareau on Mar 9, 2005 16:02:46 GMT -5
It really would be weird to have a class that defines "The Worlds Best Novice." ;D Sounds kind of redundant to me. Well if they can name the nation's best novice....then world's best novice would seem possible too. Kind of funny when you think about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Ryan Thames on Mar 9, 2005 16:11:16 GMT -5
Circulurologicaly funed............if it aint a word i just invented it. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by leonard on Mar 9, 2005 16:37:35 GMT -5
We have been holding a novice at Nationals from the beginning but it does not give you a "Novice National Championship". You simply win the novice division at the USAA Nationals. We have different requirements for novice but the idea is still the same. Providing weight classes for new armwrestlers so they can compete and get hooked on our sport  . Sounds sinister  but getting new armwrestlers is serious. Leonard |
|
. Sounds sinister 
but getting new armwrestlers is serious.