|
|
Post by guy on Nov 24, 2004 9:59:40 GMT -5
Engin I did it over because I thought it would be best to condense the choices
I think the option at 260 is too heavy, Did you mean 250 or 260 ? 250 would be better but it's only 19 pounds form 231. I always felt 250-255 would be a better class then 242 so maybe better to have
COULD HAVE STANDARD CLASSES LIKE 154 176 198 CUT THE 220 OUT AND HAVE 242 AND OVER
|
|
|
|
Post by Kurt Howgate on Nov 24, 2004 10:19:38 GMT -5
I also wish there was a 250 lb. class!
|
|
|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 24, 2004 10:52:25 GMT -5
Guy,it wasnt my choice.i just put what ppl wrote on the other poll.i just copied their suggestions to make it more democratical.but if you didnt like it no problem for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Bylbie on Nov 24, 2004 11:50:10 GMT -5
Im all for a 250lbs class! I hate eating less... ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 24, 2004 12:30:42 GMT -5
It doesnt seem like we can or will make everyone happy so we need to find one that will.
I think 4 weight classes going from 198 to supers is too much . yes there are a few exceptions SO what?
should be a 230 cut in or a 250 or so
TEXT
|
|
|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 24, 2004 12:33:41 GMT -5
i see a true leader!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 24, 2004 16:28:39 GMT -5
After giving it some more thought and listening to people, I think we should use the weight classes people pull in mostly. And some like Travis thinks it should only be 3 classes, that is the other extreme.
I definately feel it shpuldnt be 200 and over.
I think the best rankings could fall in here after all most Nevada tournaments run these classes too
154 -- 176-- 198- 242 and supers
what do you think Engin and everyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bill Cox on Nov 24, 2004 16:31:27 GMT -5
154,176,198,242, supers. That would work for me.  |
|
|
|
Post by Olin Lucas on Nov 24, 2004 16:31:40 GMT -5
I still think there should be a 165lb class.  |
|
|
|
Post by Steven Lareau on Nov 24, 2004 18:06:02 GMT -5
Wouldn't it be easier to just say it all in kilograms to keep up with the rest of the world?
|
|
|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 25, 2004 6:53:44 GMT -5
with kg,70-80-90-110-supers
|
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 25, 2004 7:59:51 GMT -5
But if you add 165 class then you have argument for 189 or even 220. I would be more in favor of adding 165 over the other two only because I think a pound means more in a lighter person body % difference
|
|
