|
|
Post by TK on Dec 19, 2010 23:22:36 GMT -5
Sent Kurt a PM.... Still waiting I guess for deleting old threads.
|
|
|
|
Post by Karl "SUPERMAN" Stanley on Jan 4, 2011 7:40:43 GMT -5
I think overalls should effect overall rankings, example if me and Danial worely meet in the overall finals then the winner should be ranked higher in overalls for the state of Florida
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Jan 4, 2011 9:50:33 GMT -5
I think overalls should effect overall rankings, example if me and Danial worely meet in the overall finals then the winner should be ranked higher in overalls for the state of Florida WITH ya'll being in 2 dif weight classes, it wouldnt factor anyways, but as an over all in Florida it'd be considered (as a head 2 head win)but as been stated...hate to say it....but overalls have wayyy too many varibables for SEC rankings.... the variable Karl is.....let's say for instance Florida state?....Glenn Brooks pulled masters righty.....the class has 3 guys in it.....he pulled like 2 matches?...at best 3?.....the 220 class had 5-6 guys in it?...more pulls for 220....one class can be thicker than another and another person could skate through.... overalls are as stated before simply for show.....noone takes them seriously....i have been converted to this idea due to watching a few overalls come out the smaller guy wins everytime due to less compettion at that level....in my opinon......overalls should be a thing of the past beings noone takes them seriously .......please directors stop doing them.when the heavyweight class is 220+.....that class will always be full compared to the lightweights. TK |
|
|
|
Post by Karl "SUPERMAN" Stanley on Jan 4, 2011 10:32:26 GMT -5
So how do we make our way up the overall ranking list? I doubt any heavier weight class would accept a challenge match from a lighter weight class puller because they have nothing to really gain and its not like a heavier weight guy can pull in a lower weight class to pull against a lighter weight guy ranked ahead of him in overalls like a lighter weight can jump up in classes so maybe overall rankings should not take place...
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Jan 4, 2011 10:42:27 GMT -5
So how do we make our way up the overall ranking list? I doubt any heavier weight class would accept a challenge match from a lighter weight class puller because they have nothing to really gain and its not like a heavier weight guy can pull in a lower weight class to pull against a lighter weight guy ranked ahead of him in overalls like a lighter weight can jump up in classes so maybe overall rankings should not take place... YEAH....I AGREE it's it tough on an overall rankings on who is the BEST. but with the level you & Worley are on..i think a challenge match would be a good matchup! or if SAY Danial was to pull in SS IN MARCH POSSIBLY? something like that could work. or if Danial pulls your class? it's bound to happen sooner or later. ya'll finished 2-2 against each other this last year. best of 5 or round robin? TK |
|
|
|
Post by TK on Jan 5, 2011 19:42:05 GMT -5
Rules fellow pullers of the SEC!
Movement within the 10?
Let's hear a format that would keep 65% of y'all happy!.... We know everyone won't be happy.... LoL
If puller 7 beats puller 4
Do they swap?..... Or does 4 go backward and 7 goes forward?
Or 4 go behind 7... Move 5-6-7 up 4 behind 8?....
Me.... I'm a football kinda guy.... So I watch BCS rankings and coaches polls and I watch NFL rankings.....
Really I feel 5-6-7 eases up a notch because of the factor that 7 didn't defeat 5-6....sometimes conflicting style armwrestlers can beat one guy and lose to another.....5-6 could motion to not be jumped without actually being beaten?
I'm stumped and would like to hear from the pullers? Everyone?
This is about all of us, we all wanna be ranked!
Input please!
TK
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Jan 5, 2011 20:28:11 GMT -5
Armwrestling is about styles we all know this, but our sec pullers don't pull each other enough to justify not moving people ahead of people they beat, especially when they beat them 2-0 in the same day, and swapping positions is ubserd, the guy who got beat shouldn't in turn fall behind guys he has already past, if some one jumps over me by beating aaron blevins then I will just have to go out and beat that guy, and then aaron can be mad cause now im jumping over him, but people are constantly training just because you beat someone before doesn't mean you could do it today.
If we go any way but winner moves up then its gonna get too complicated and once again we will have tons of whining and no resolution.
Having said that if two pullers split matches that should be taken into consideration
If three pullers pull in circles meaning a beats b, b beats c, c beats a, then none of them should move anywhere, but if this gets too complicated then just like the bcs it will be inacurate and suck, and only a single elim tourney will fix it
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Jan 6, 2011 7:34:24 GMT -5
WOW DAVID,
WE ASK FOR OPINIONS AND CANT GET ONE....LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Jan 6, 2011 8:08:37 GMT -5
PUTTING THROUGH THE MOTION TODAY TO THE OTHER 5.
RANKINGS MOVEMENT.
T/K
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Jan 6, 2011 12:28:43 GMT -5
ALSO..ACTIVITY....WE'LL PLACE AN ASTERICK* BY THE PULLERS TO SHOW THEIR ACTIVITY
AND I'D LIKE TO MOTION A 6 MONTH ACTIVITY CLAUSE, WHERE IF SOMEONE DOESNT PULL AT ONCE WITHIN 6 MONTHS..THEY DROP TO THE INACTIVITY LIST.
WHEN THEY RETURN IT'LL BE EARNED BACK IN THROUGH DEFEATING A RANKED PULLER.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
T/K
|
|
|
|
Post by 'Stump' Burton on Jan 6, 2011 12:55:44 GMT -5
ALSO..ACTIVITY....WE'LL PLACE AN ASTERICK* BY THE PULLERS TO SHOW THEIR ACTIVITY AND I'D LIKE TO MOTION A 6 MONTH ACTIVITY CLAUSE, WHERE IF SOMEONE DOESNT PULL AT ONCE WITHIN 6 MONTHS..THEY DROP TO THE INACTIVITY LIST. WHEN THEY RETURN IT'LL BE EARNED BACK IN THROUGH DEFEATING A RANKED PULLER. WHAT DO YOU THINK? T/K I like it. |
|
|
|
Post by Anthony Edens on Jan 7, 2011 8:47:06 GMT -5
Agree.
So you're saying every month that a puller doesn't pull they will get an asterisk next to their name. Once they acquire 6 asterisks, they are moved to the inactivity list?
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Jan 7, 2011 9:28:27 GMT -5
Agree. So you're saying every month that a puller doesn't pull they will get an asterisk next to their name. Once they acquire 6 asterisks, they are moved to the inactivity list? WELL ACTUALLY, an asterisks will go by thier name by how many tourneys they DO go to....... we can create another symbol for inactivity, but if they don't have an asterisks by july?....they can be moved to inactive list.... this will help rank the guys who are pulling. i've mapped it out and there are SEC tourneys happening in all 6 months and diff regions...including the SEC CHAMPIONSHIP IN ALBANY, GA. TO NOT GO TO ANY OF THOSE? TK |
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Jan 7, 2011 19:37:28 GMT -5
I like it, it shouldnt be hard to make one tourney every six months
|
|
|
|
Post by Danial Worely on Jan 8, 2011 0:55:58 GMT -5
all this crap yall r talking about is crazy lol and confusing ...... my method is never lose  and i agree to have one tourney ever 6 months as well |
|
and i agree to have one tourney ever 6 months as well