|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 23, 2004 8:55:03 GMT -5
Guy,its a great idea.lets piick the weight classes first.any other idea about classes welcome:)
|
|
|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 23, 2004 8:57:49 GMT -5
or 143-165-187-220-242-over
|
|
|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 23, 2004 9:02:34 GMT -5
it was Guy Lasorsa' idea and i loved it.we have the best potential of doing this at our msg board.maybe then we decide to pick the names for the each class one by one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Olin Lucas on Nov 23, 2004 9:21:04 GMT -5
or 143-165-187-220-242-over Engin I would have to go with these classes. These have always been my favorites, and at 165lbs I feel extremely powerful. That is just my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 23, 2004 9:25:07 GMT -5
so if everyone likes the idea and support as a new rankings then we also count the votes that i added off the poll.so it has one vote from you already:).
|
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 23, 2004 11:56:34 GMT -5
Thanks Engin.
I like 154 171 189 209 242 and over
or 143 165 187 215 and over
|
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 23, 2004 11:58:30 GMT -5
Lets see how this poll comes out then run the winner versus a couple ofthe weight class Ideas below and see how it comes out
|
|
|
|
Post by Bill Cox on Nov 23, 2004 16:07:18 GMT -5
I like the classes: 0-154, 155-176, 177-198, 199-220, 221-242, 243-UP. Right Hand
0-165, 166-198, 199-220, 221-UP. Left Hand.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Gangi on Nov 23, 2004 16:46:31 GMT -5
i agree with bill those weight classes give everyone more room to advance in the rankings.......
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Dardenne on Nov 23, 2004 17:06:20 GMT -5
[shadow=red,left,300]154 171 189 209 242 and over gets my vote !![/shadow]
[glow=red,2,300]M.A.D.[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by Christopher Myers on Nov 23, 2004 18:41:18 GMT -5
154,171,189,209,231,250-260,260+
it is not fair to lump a guy 232 with 280 ... 40lbs is 40 lbs no matter what you weigh ..... I think a guy like kurt Howgate should not have to go againt Travis or Randall if he weighs 250 and they weigh 280-290
just my opinion
Christopher Myers
|
|
|
|
Post by Chad Silvers on Nov 23, 2004 18:58:31 GMT -5
154 , 176 , 198 , & HEAVY !
I think these should be the standard weight classes for every tournament and that all rankings should be based on these classes.
|
|
|
|
Post by enginterzi on Nov 24, 2004 5:17:24 GMT -5
so how are we gonna make this happen?
|
|
|
|
Post by CHRISTIAN BINNIE on Nov 24, 2004 10:07:36 GMT -5
I agree with Chad!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jim Wagner on Nov 24, 2004 11:52:22 GMT -5
IMO you need to keep the heavy classes, 198 and up is too much. Why should a guy who is 170 not have to pull someone 200? the same applies for someone 210, they shouldnt have to give up over 20 lbs. So, 220, 242-heavy's just my 2 cents
|
|
