|
|
Post by Matt "CHOP" Bertrand on Apr 16, 2011 14:59:23 GMT -5
Waf
|
|
|
|
Post by Anthony Edens on Apr 16, 2011 19:31:58 GMT -5
WAF
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Apr 16, 2011 20:11:34 GMT -5
5-1.... One more vote and it's WAF.
Thanks guys,
I got some studying to do.
TK
|
|
|
|
Post by Christina Casto on Apr 16, 2011 21:47:28 GMT -5
waf
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Apr 17, 2011 6:38:40 GMT -5
6-1
WAF it is!
Thanks for the quick voting folks!
TK
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Apr 17, 2011 9:53:24 GMT -5
Tk
not much studying just take a look at leonards post on the waf/aaa rules thread
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Apr 18, 2011 21:09:56 GMT -5
official motion
FOR or AGAINST
ranking pullers in multiple weight classes
........................
AGAINST
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Apr 19, 2011 1:33:13 GMT -5
official motion FOR or AGAINST ranking pullers in multiple weight classes ........................ AGAINST FOR |
|
|
|
Post by Chuck Westberry on Apr 19, 2011 7:35:21 GMT -5
against
|
|
|
|
Post by Karen Bean on Apr 19, 2011 9:30:53 GMT -5
I'm good with either. Both have positives and negatives. I do like the 10:00 - 2:00 rule but I've seen guys pull their opponent past the this zone in a winning position and then either flop wrist or roll completely out to get a win. the 10-2 rule is both, the only difference is if you slip in that postition just pulling you lose regardless if it is intentional or not David could you please explain this to me? Are you saying that in AAA if you slip past 10-2 it's an automatic loss? |
|
|
|
Post by Anthony Edens on Apr 19, 2011 10:42:49 GMT -5
In Dan Benoit's case, I'm against it. If someone is actually pulling both 98's and 242's at every tournament they attend and are consistently placing top 3, then I can't see why we shouldn't rank them. After all the ultimate purpose of rankings is to increase tournament attendance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Edwards on Apr 19, 2011 11:39:52 GMT -5
official motion
FOR or AGAINST
ranking pullers in multiple weight classes
Against
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Apr 19, 2011 13:43:29 GMT -5
the 10-2 rule is both, the only difference is if you slip in that postition just pulling you lose regardless if it is intentional or not David could you please explain this to me? Are you saying that in AAA if you slip past 10-2 it's an automatic loss? As far as I know or have been told of AAA rules(which I dont swear to be an expert on having only pulled with them a few events) any slip in a losing position is a loss regaurdless if it is intentional or not, ......10-2 being simply the definition of a losing position, I am not positive about any small variations to the rule that have to do with hand control or other variables, just that to my knowledge the 10-2 term simply describes the losing poition |
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Apr 19, 2011 13:54:37 GMT -5
In Dan Benoit's case, I'm against it. If someone is actually pulling both 98's and 242's at every tournament they attend and are consistently placing top 3, then I can't see why we shouldn't rank them. After all the ultimate purpose of rankings is to increase tournament attendance. sorry Antonman, this is unclear to me, completely for or completely against, and then if it comes to it the voting will decide if Benoits double ranked |
|
|
|
Post by Anthony Edens on Apr 19, 2011 14:23:14 GMT -5
Officially Against.
Here is a hypothetical of what I was saying that I would approve of: Say for some reason Chad Silvers starts really caring about the Southeast rankings and wants to be #1 in the 76's and 98's.
So he starts pulling both classes at several key tournaments and wins each one. In his case I doubt he was entering multiple classes for the purpose of rankings, but how can we not have him ranked for his performances in both classes?
How does the West do it with Corey Miller? He dominates 54's, 65's, 76's, and occasionally 98's.
|
|
