|
|
Post by Matt "CHOP" Bertrand on Apr 21, 2011 16:31:03 GMT -5
the votes are for multiple rankings
|
|
|
|
Post by Kirk Wickizer on Apr 22, 2011 8:49:38 GMT -5
Against
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Apr 22, 2011 15:25:24 GMT -5
OK...NOW WE DON'T HAVE MULTIPLE RANKINGS.
LET'S TAKE A VOTE ON OVERALL RANKINGS....RIGHT & LEFT.....
WE'LL KICK START IT AFTER REGIONALS IS OVER?
MY MOTION FOR AN OVERALL RANKINGS WITH ALL 10 (OR 12 BY THEN) VOTES ON POSTION ON TOP 10 ONLY.
RIGHT & LEFT:
T/K
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Apr 22, 2011 17:45:30 GMT -5
OK...NOW WE DON'T HAVE MULTIPLE RANKINGS. LET'S TAKE A VOTE ON OVERALL RANKINGS....RIGHT & LEFT..... WE'LL KICK START IT AFTER REGIONALS IS OVER? MY MOTION FOR AN OVERALL RANKINGS WITH ALL 10 (OR 12 BY THEN) VOTES ON POSTION ON TOP 10 ONLY. RIGHT & LEFT: T/K for |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Egan on Apr 22, 2011 20:36:13 GMT -5
i have one ? for us guys that are 154 down here in fl i new yall voted on not have multiple rankings but why not becuase most of the tournys i attend to i have to pull 176 because of not haveing a 154 class i was just woundering is this just for the sec and or {can states ranking still gong to have multiple ranks like florida does} this last Qustion is for tk
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Apr 22, 2011 20:45:55 GMT -5
i have one ? for us guys that are 154 down here in fl i new yall voted on not have multiple rankings but why not becuase most of the tournys i attend to i have to pull 176 because of not haveing a 154 class i was just woundering is this just for the sec and or {can states ranking still gong to have multiple ranks like florida does} this last Qustion is for tk this is for the SEC only, anyone ranking his/her state individualy can choose to do whatever they want with them. personally, I do the Tennessee State rankings and choose not to rank people in multi classes, I could be ranked in every class above 176 and that in my mind would do more harm than good, this would be the case for many pro's in our state |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Egan on Apr 22, 2011 20:48:45 GMT -5
ok was just woundering thanks david
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Edwards on Apr 23, 2011 18:59:57 GMT -5
MY MOTION FOR AN OVERALL RANKINGS WITH ALL 10 (OR 12 BY THEN) VOTES ON POSTION ON TOP 10 ONLY.
RIGHT & LEFT:
T/K
FOR
|
|
|
|
Post by Christina Casto on Apr 23, 2011 22:39:00 GMT -5
for
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt "CHOP" Bertrand on Apr 24, 2011 3:02:07 GMT -5
FOR
|
|
|
|
Post by 'Stump' Burton on Apr 24, 2011 19:53:43 GMT -5
for
|
|
|
|
Post by David Owens on Apr 24, 2011 21:25:54 GMT -5
ok so with tk thats 6 votes FOR having an overall class, guess its time to get our respective lists togather, I say we all put togather a list of 10 and do a reverse points system
something like this
each number 1 would get 10 points
2 would get 9
3 would get 8 and so on
then add all the points togather and tk only post the top ten
everyone good with that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Christina Casto on Apr 24, 2011 21:41:54 GMT -5
good
|
|
|
|
Post by TK on Apr 25, 2011 4:57:24 GMT -5
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin "Bama Bull" Bishop on Aug 17, 2013 7:26:27 GMT -5
I have a question, are we still doing who beat who or opinionated rankings? I'm pretty sure its who beat who but I'm jw? I think everyones opinion would be close to the who beat who, but I'm coming around to the opinionated rankings they seem to be more accurate as long as there's no favoritism lol  shouldn't matter if ya don't lose anyway lol |
|
shouldn't matter if ya don't lose anyway lol