|
|
Post by Chris Kaufman on Sept 26, 2011 15:21:11 GMT -5
Apparently Perry's campaign is imploding, so I'm curious if they'll make the debates between Paul and Romney now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Wells on Sept 26, 2011 16:40:23 GMT -5
They want to avoid anything Paul has to say unless they have too because he actually makes sense and makes those other do-do's look ignorant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Logan Schuetzle on Sept 28, 2011 22:10:39 GMT -5
Apparently Perry's campaign is imploding, so I'm curious if they'll make the debates between Paul and Romney now. Come on now Chris.. they still don't mention him in poll results. That will never happen. My top 3 Paul Cain Johnson |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Wells on Sept 29, 2011 8:06:08 GMT -5
My top 3:
Ron Paul
Herman Cain
Bill Cosby î„
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Kaufman on Sept 29, 2011 8:39:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by John Wilson on Sept 29, 2011 9:29:50 GMT -5
Cain is more well known in the south. It's never mentioned for some reason but he has a radio presence out of Atlanta and fills in for other national radio talk show hosts. I heard him several years ago and have liked him ever since.
Herman Cain is popular among conservatives. His name is not new among us southern conservatives which is why he polls well here.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Wilson on Sept 29, 2011 9:31:53 GMT -5
I honestly believe the media is acknowledging him because they still won't recognize Ron Paul. It tells me the establishment media is less afraid of a Cain challenge to Obama than one from Paul. I think the acknowledgement is also their way of putting a target on Cain's back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Wells on Sept 29, 2011 10:08:05 GMT -5
Or, they're mentioning Cain more and more because they have a plan to smash his name at the end.
I'm changing my Top 3:
Ron Paul
Herman Cain
Joe Arpaio
|
|
|
|
Post by Kirk Wickizer on Sept 29, 2011 11:41:58 GMT -5
I like Herman Cain. I think Romney is another good one and has more ideas when it comes to international relations.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Kaufman on Sept 29, 2011 13:13:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Wells on Sept 29, 2011 17:11:15 GMT -5
The thing is, The media loves Romney and Perry. Therefor candidates still heading for the same end agenda, just taking a different road. We need someone opposing these core problems. We need large corporations and government, just can't have them being buddy buddy. That's when "better for the people" gets replaced with "better for self".
|
|
|
|
Post by Logan Schuetzle on Sept 29, 2011 17:23:19 GMT -5
I would have liked to here what else Cain had to say before jones cut it off. Who knows what to believe anymore. Does alexactually believe that Ron Paul would win if it wasn't for fraud? I'm not so sure. Just based on talking to people around here. I have convinced some people, I know both my parents are voting Romney. Ron Paul is to much change for the older crowd. They bUy into the crazy uncle Ron notion. That the country would fall apart without the government regulating everything.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Wilson on Sept 29, 2011 19:06:04 GMT -5
Cain is not going to appeal to anyone who is looking for an anarchist for President, which is what an ultra-libertarian really is.
Am I happy with Cain's ties to the Fed? No, but it's not a show-stopper either. As much as we all like Ron Paul's stance on that, abolishing the Fed is not within Presidential power. Ron Paul as President may put some horsepower behind the movement, but what really has to happen is a congressional act that the President then signs. He can tell Congress "Hey, if you can make this legislation happen then I'm ready to sign it." but that's all he can do.
No congress is going to eliminate the Fed. It will not happen.
So, aside from the Fed- what's the problem with Cain? I'm sure there are some areas of disagreement, but not on the big stuff. Not for me.
I really like the 9-9-9 tax plan he has put together. I think it's the single best idea to get the economy moving that I've heard. Again, abolishing the income tax all together is the best idea, but it will not happen. So the best idea in reality is always the best bet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Kaufman on Sept 29, 2011 20:10:55 GMT -5
Cain is not going to appeal to anyone who is looking for an anarchist for President, which is what an ultra-libertarian really is. Am I happy with Cain's ties to the Fed? No, but it's not a show-stopper either. As much as we all like Ron Paul's stance on that, abolishing the Fed is not within Presidential power. Ron Paul as President may put some horsepower behind the movement, but what really has to happen is a congressional act that the President then signs. He can tell Congress "Hey, if you can make this legislation happen then I'm ready to sign it." but that's all he can do. No congress is going to eliminate the Fed. It will not happen. So, aside from the Fed- what's the problem with Cain? I'm sure there are some areas of disagreement, but not on the big stuff. Not for me. I really like the 9-9-9 tax plan he has put together. I think it's the single best idea to get the economy moving that I've heard. Again, abolishing the income tax all together is the best idea, but it will not happen. So the best idea in reality is always the best bet. Jones talked about the fact that the Fair Tax or something like 9-9-9 is just a ploy to create a consumption tax while still keeping the income tax where it's at because it'd have to get "fazed" in. I like the idea of a Fair Tax, but it does seem a little fishy. www.infowars.com/huckabee-talks-up-oxymoronic-fair-tax/www.infowars.com/founder-of-fairtax-org-was-a-former-director-of-the-dallas-federal-reserve/ |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Kaufman on Sept 30, 2011 20:16:42 GMT -5
Watch this and send it to everyone you know:
|
|
