|
Post by Bob Paradis on Jul 18, 2007 14:41:36 GMT -5
When your attracted to them sexually it's a sin. I didn't say if you thought they were handsome,cute,pretty,etc...... But if you are attracted sexually then yes. Even if you think about them sexually it's a sin. Even Jesus said that. Thinking sexually about some IS lust. You are not listening. Lust is to desire sexually. Attraction does not imply lust.
|
|
|
Post by Pete & Tim on Jul 18, 2007 14:53:50 GMT -5
Hey Bob, can we not discuss this tonight at practice?
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Edwards on Jul 18, 2007 14:54:14 GMT -5
I said if you are ATTRACTED to them SEXUALLY. If your attracted to someone sexually that means you think about them in a sexual way which is lust. But for a man to long after a man like he would a woman is wrong. God didn't mean for men to be attracted to men like he would be a woman. I agree with the Demon theory on why people say some can't help it, it's just cause there is a demon tormenting them.
Even from an un-biblical view point that is wrong. From a biological view-point you can see homosexuality is wrong. Nature wouldn't have intended for there to be gay people if you wanna get right down to it. A man an a man can't have kids an neither can two women. So just from a biological aspect they would be outcast. It's common sence to me that you shouldn't think about being gay nor support it in any way sin is sin you aren't supposed to support it or make excuses for it.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Edwards on Jul 18, 2007 14:56:02 GMT -5
Thats all I got to say about it. Im done.
|
|
|
Post by Pete & Tim on Jul 18, 2007 14:56:03 GMT -5
Hey some men are just HOT!!!! Maybe we should all be gay abd love one another.
|
|
|
Post by Anthony Snook on Jul 18, 2007 16:35:53 GMT -5
That may spark another well deserved discussion, why are there so many black men imprisoned?
Maybe they are the one's committing crimes? I though I had heard(don't know where) that the prison population in the US was close to being equal among the races?
|
|
|
Post by Robert Bishop on Jul 18, 2007 17:06:35 GMT -5
One more name just got added to my prayer list and its not Anthony
|
|
|
Post by Anthony Snook on Jul 18, 2007 17:22:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mat Helmer on Jul 18, 2007 17:50:52 GMT -5
10 pages and nobody (except Nancy) has commented on physical differences in the womb. This thread has become a right vs. wrong, God vs. Satan debate. Bob, wear that "tight little number" to practice.
|
|
|
Post by CHRISTIAN BINNIE on Jul 18, 2007 18:27:23 GMT -5
Nancy: You mean there are no Hispanics in Louisiana Prisons?
|
|
|
Post by Bob Paradis on Jul 18, 2007 21:01:01 GMT -5
Nancy: You mean there are no Hispanics in Louisiana Prisons? Good question. Maybe they got them split up between black and white. And what would the 99 "other" be that wouldn't fall into black or white?
|
|
|
Post by Bob Paradis on Jul 18, 2007 21:04:51 GMT -5
10 pages and nobody (except Nancy) has commented on physical differences in the womb. This thread has become a right vs. wrong, God vs. Satan debate. Bob, wear that "tight little number" to practice. If you want to see me in something tight, you must be real desperate...LOL
|
|
|
Post by Bob Paradis on Jul 18, 2007 21:42:44 GMT -5
Mathew,
When the American Medical Association concludes (not merely suggests that there might be) that DNA or other physical conditions predispose a person to be gay, then we have something to talk about.
The rest of it is just blah, blah, blah. 23% vs 8% on the hair whorl does not convince me of anything. I'll give the researchers credit for trying because it is a perplexing area of study.
I know the Theological and Psychological aspects of the argument, but have no intention of doing all of that typing. That's a discussion you can only have face to face anyhow. If I don't explain myself well, then I offend someone. Face up, the potentially offended person could ask what I meant, and the unclear communication could be straightened out.
No one has ever convinced me that a physical connection exists, but that doesn't mean it doesn't. From what I do know, it isn't very likely though. Later Gripper King!!!
Bob
|
|
|
Post by Tim Layton on Jul 18, 2007 22:26:55 GMT -5
Even from an un-biblical view point that is wrong. From a biological view-point you can see homosexuality is wrong. Nature wouldn't have intended for there to be gay people if you wanna get right down to it. A man an a man can't have kids an neither can two women. So just from a biological aspect they would be outcast. It's common sence to me that you shouldn't think about being gay nor support it in any way sin is sin you aren't supposed to support it or make excuses for it. Maybe you missed my earlier posts. Homosexuality is present in nature and homosexuals are produced by nature. By definition, homosexuality is natural just like heterosexuality. Anyone with basic knowledge of biology knows that homosexual behavior has been observed in many animals, including humans. Homosexuality from a biological perspective isn't wrong or right - it simply exists. Human ignorance is what fuels hatred or disapproval of homosexuality.
|
|
|
Post by Austin Slater on Jul 18, 2007 23:41:36 GMT -5
So there are animals that are strictly homosexual in nature? Ive always thought homosexual behavior isnt based on desire in the animal kingdom but more a show of dominance. To say homosexuality is plainy seen in nature in the same sense its seen in humans is false in my opinion and Ive never seen any research to back your claim up. So ignorance is behind anyone who disproves of homosexuality? I dont mean to be rude I just disagree with your assesment. . .
|
|